Reducing CO2 emissions to zero is the only option  PDF Print E-mail
Description

Climate modelling supports CAT’s zerocarbonbritain report

To avoid catastrophic climate change, we need to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions to zero, according to research from the University of Victoria in Canada.

This data supports CAT’s groundbreaking energy strategy, zerocarbonbritain, which also advocates a 100% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible – an energy scenario explored within the report demonstrates it is possible to make these changes within 20 years.

CAT Development Director Paul Allen said: “The results from the University of Victoria back up our reading of the climate science, and highlight the immense challenge we now face.”

The team from the University of Victoria used a computer model to determine how much emissions must be limited to avoid exceeding a 2°C increase. They looked at reducing emissions by between 20% and 100% of 2006 levels by 2050. Only when emissions were entirely eliminated did the temperature increase remain below 2°C.

Mr Allen said: “If global temperatures rise more than 2°C, climate change will rapidly spiral out of control. The EU has pledged to reduce emissions to keep warming below this level, but their target of a 50% reduction in emissions by 2050 is too little, too late.

“Solving climate change is urgent, we need the right policies to eliminate all emissions from fossil fuels right now.”

zerocarbonbritain recommends technologies and policies to meet this challenge. It advocates a series of electronic carbon allowances known as Tradable Energy Quotas (TEQs) which would create a market driver for renewable energy, as products and services which use less fossil fuels would be cheaper.

This all happens within a global framework, allowing every nation’s per capita emissions to equalise, then reduce to zero. The scenario outlined in the report shows how the UK could reduce its overall energy use by 50%, then meet the remaining demand with 100% non-nuclear renewable energy.

Contact: Arthur Girling 01654 705953 ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it )



User reviews

Average user rating from: 1 user(s)

Rating
5.0
 

Add new review


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful

End game, Wednesday, 05 December 2007

Written by Mick Huckerby

It is ironic that the very thing we treasure in the 'advanced world' - 'democracy'- will be the very thing that defeats us on the need for rapid implimentation of measures to reverse climate change. UK governments can only attain (and retain) power by representing the middle ground. That middle ground is moving too slow on this issue to allow any radical responce by it's government. We have the facts and figures (although even in a couple of months they are now out of date), we now need to build a critical mass of 'public opinion' to free the government for action. CAT now needs to apply the same methodology to this problem as it applied to the carbon issue. For the moment I havn't a clear view of direction on this, but as the time has now dissappeared for niceties perhaps the tactics of the money speculators to the ERM is a subject lesson in applying pressure. One thing is for sure - at some point, without any positive change, draconian measures will be implimented to contain the disintegration of societies whether 'advanced' or otherwise.

Oh! By the way, the opening paragraph ..."To avoid catastophic climate change " ... is a little insular - for some, catastrophic climate change is already on them!
Was this review helpful to you? yes     no


Powered by jReviews





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!